millenniumfalcon.com

by **Forcechoke** » February 7th 2004 12:10 am

From TOS:

http://www.starwars.com/episode-iii/bts ... index.html

His previous editing work includes such movies as Bad Boys II, Ghost Ship, Pearl Harbor, Gone in 60 Seconds, and Armageddon.

by **Ziggy** » February 7th 2004 1:16 am

Those films had many problems, but I dont think editing is among them.

Besides Lucas, Burt, and Barton are working together. I think it'll be fine. :cool:

by **foxbatkllr** » February 7th 2004 1:27 am

Yeah I think the editing in those films was fine.

by **Hade** » February 7th 2004 3:13 am

He can't be any worse than that Lucas/Burtt combo platter.

by **foxbatkllr** » February 7th 2004 3:32 am

I'm watching Gone in 60 Seconds on TV right now and I quite like the editing, especially during the action scenes.

by **Forcechoke** » February 7th 2004 4:14 am

Darth Hade wrote:He can't be any worse than that Lucas/Burtt combo platter.

True. And it's not like we have much choice.

Those movies just seem kinda "A.D.H.D." though, if you get me.

by **Hade** » February 7th 2004 6:11 am

foxbatkllr wrote:I'm watching Gone in 60 Seconds on TV right now and I quite like the editing, especially during the action scenes.

On TNT?

by **Hade** » February 7th 2004 6:13 am

Force Kin wrote:
Darth Hade wrote:He can't be any worse than that Lucas/Burtt combo platter.

True. And it's not like we have much choice.

Those movies just seem kinda "A.D.H.D." though, if you get me.

I hear ya.

Ghost Ship was an awful movie, but the edting was crisp. It had an interesting, foreboding feel to it. That's something I'd like Episode III to have.

by **Benovyte** » February 7th 2004 7:19 am

So basically Michael Bay's editor is working on Episode 3. I'm not sure I like the idea though because Bay's movies are cut like music videos. Barely any shots are longer than 2 or 3 seconds. Then again considering the amount of action in Ep3 this could be just what it needs.

by **Forcechoke** » February 7th 2004 9:17 am

Ghost Ship and Bad Boyz II are the only ones I haven't seen on that list, so I'll take your word on Ghost Ship.

I don't know shit about editing a damn film anyways...

by **Assy** » February 7th 2004 10:50 am

Pearl Harbor was fine, but should have ended after the attack. The Doolittle Raid seemed excessive and rushed.

No qualm on the editing front, though.

by **Justin** » February 7th 2004 12:03 pm

Christ anything has to be better then the editing for attack of the clones. I've seen most of those movies and have no beef with the editing.

by **royalguard96** » February 7th 2004 1:31 pm

I agree with Justin on this issue.

Burtt had one job too many on AOTC.

by **Justin** » February 7th 2004 7:25 pm

Sorry have to pipe in on this one again, some of the editing in AoTC was superb, other spots are well just plain shit. And for the average movie fan like me to notice it must be bad. And I can't say for certain if Lucas let big B just have at the whole thing or he personally helped edit certain parts out. But regardless with a new editor in place I think this indicates good things for e3.

by SI » February 7th 2004 9:33 pm

If there's one problem I have with AOTC it is definately the editing.

If anyone wants to see great editing then check out Pearl Harbor again. Cheers Rodg...

by **Ternian** » February 8th 2004 3:32 am

The editor on AotC should have been shot and then stampled on by Stampy.

I don't care who the new editor is...as long as it isn't BB.

by **foxbatkllr** » February 9th 2004 3:05 am

I just watched the bombing of Pearl Harbor and it was quite well edited. I can't say for the rest of the movie, because I've never seen the whole thing but it's on TV so I decided to watch some of it for the editing.

millenniumfalcon.com

Worst Editor Ever?

Worst Editor Ever?

Statistics