Evil_Elvis wrote:Also, didn't he give the money from the sale to Disney to education charities in the States?
Evil_Elvis wrote:Lucas created this whole crazy thing called "The Star Wars" so for that he gets ultimate respect and a by at a lot of things. I understand his frustration at the whole raped-childhood type behaviour of some fans, the internet has given a lot of people a voice and audience they maybe wouldn't or shouldn't have had, particularly around the time of the Prequels when the net was just coming into it's own.
Also, didn't he give the money from the sale to Disney to education charities in the States? It's not like he was down to his last million at the time though.
Evil_Elvis wrote:Everyone had their opinions and it was suddenly a matter of logging on and you could assign and share the most ridiculously OTT verbiage to describe what is essentially a children's movie with the world, writ large.
The theory of monkeys and typewriters stands here, while you can do it, sometimes maybe it's better if you don't. It's entertainment after all. If you find you don't like it, there's hunners of other shit out there for you to tune into.
bearvomit wrote:personally I think this man is just as influential if not more so than Steve Jobs. this was his baby and he took it a little personally that Disney didn't want to use his ideas for the new trilogy. He's probably had his version of the story in his mind since ROTJ and they read it and said GTFO.
He was once again being rejected by a big studio. His professional life had come full circle.
It was like poetry.
Evil_Elvis wrote:Smart ass pants? Sure, why not...
My point was, while it's totally acceptable to like/dislike things in the way people have ad infinitum, the dawn of the internet/chat rooms/forums occurred around the same time as the Prequel build up and has given every butt-hurt virgin a forum to spew forth their venom at the fact that the film they'd imagined in their heads wasn't what they got in a way that Lucas and the world at large had never experienced before. Everyone had their opinions and it was suddenly a matter of logging on and you could assign and share the most ridiculously OTT verbiage to describe what is essentially a children's movie with the world, writ large.
The theory of monkeys and typewriters stands here, while you can do it, sometimes maybe it's better if you don't. It's entertainment after all. If you find you don't like it, there's hunners of other shit out there for you to tune into.
That, and you missed a "had" out. Good chat though.
Topeka wrote:Can we not follow the Lucasfilm playbook from the 90s and rewrite history? Star Wars wouldn't be what it is without Marcia Lucas and Richard Chew. Empire wouldn't be what it is without Kirschner and Kasdan.
That's not to take away anything from George. But he does work best when there are capable people around him to reign him in.
dromag wrote:It saddens me to see all the GL hate.
This guy was the same guy who provided us with the amazing Original trilogy that was forward thinking and that he fought tooth and nail for. It was ground breaking and took chances that no one else would. He took the same chances with the prequel trilogy and was BBQed for it. There's really no justification for the personal attacks many have levied against him. I appreciate what George has done for film and cinema and hope filmmakers continue to take bold chances that don't appear popular.
Topeka wrote:Can we not follow the Lucasfilm playbook from the 90s and rewrite history? Star Wars wouldn't be what it is without Marcia Lucas and Richard Chew. Empire wouldn't be what it is without Kirschner and Kasdan.
That's not to take away anything from George. But he does work best when there are capable people around him to reign him in.
dromag wrote:The only revisionist history going on with Star Wars are the ones to praise big Hollywood for saving Star Wars and shitting all over GL. When it was GL that fought for the independence to make these movies the way he wanted to free from the meddling of corporate suits and unions.
Everyone knows that the OT was a collaborative effort and yet it was George who chose those people free from corporations reining him in. Sheesh I don't give a fuck if you hate the PT but good lord give credit where it's due.
dusith wrote:All this Lucas bashing is just a bunch of whining bullshit. I saw ANH in the theatre when it released in '77; I was ten...
stan Marsh wrote:I don't think Tucker or Jack were great films but bring up Coppola and all anyone says is Gidfather genius. GL gets harsh criticism
Bandersnatch wrote:
Of the same age group, you and I are. I agree 100% with everything you said.
buzzfunk wrote:Lucas mistake was and still is that he doesn't "get" his own creation.
The Washington Post wrote:Lucas, to his credit, never really took the bait, but a disturbance in the Force persists. On a recent episode of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” the host, in a twerpy mood, asked his guest Harrison Ford: “Who do you like better, George Lucas or J.J. Abrams?” The audience howled. Ford paused, feigned discomfort, and said: “George has been amazing to me. He’s been the author of the early chapters of my life and given me the opportunity to have a really extraordinary life.”
Partly so he doesn’t have to read the worst about himself and his movies, Lucas says he has assiduously avoided the Internet since 2000 — no Facebook, no Twitter, no e-mail even — but that doesn’t mean he avoids people.
Out in the world, people recognize him (in the most banal places, while catching a movie with his wife at a cineplex, or reporting for jury duty, or accidentally walking into the frame of someone’s YouTube video about molten salt reactors) and they still need to pour out their feelings. Not to kvetch about Jar Jar Binks (what would be the point anymore?), but to tell him that they were once children. To tell him what “Star Wars” meant to them then and what it means to their children and grandchildren today. That story never gets old.
SI wrote:How anyone could hold any type of SW related hatred towards the man is beyond me.
SI wrote:How anyone could hold any type of SW related hatred towards the man is beyond me.
KyleKartanMG wrote:PERIOD.
This article makes me melancholy in alot of ways. It's like "the last goodbye" to Mr. Lucas who brought so much joy and happiness into my life with his creations.
I really hope he enjoys his retirement and his new Family. By all means: he deserveres it. For me I would be so happy if he would have done Ep VII at least and hand it over to Abrams or some other director AFTER starting the Sequels. But we wont ever get this so I go along with the ride which is coming very very soon.
KyleKartanMG wrote:But we wont ever get this so I go along with the ride which is coming very very soon.
ETandElliott wrote:He needs to stop coming out of his reclusion and making baffling comments that make him look like a jackass. We know he isn't, but fuck. Go back to banging your hot wife, George.
kmartnintendude wrote:In the prequel-gusher camp, I think that Star Wars Ring Theory tries too hard to find genius which, in all likelihood, just isn't objectively there.
Alexrd wrote:The Ring Theory isn't about the prequels. It's about the saga's composition and themes. All six movies. To say that it isn't objectively there is a lie because it's something observable. It's not gushing either, it's reasonable and well-argued, even if one doesn't like the movies.
To compare something like that to the RLM "reviews" which whatever the purpose are objectively fallacious (omission of facts, cherry picking, non sequiturs, strawmen, etc) is not very fair.
And as far as finding the space in-between, the same can be said about the OT, whose "flaws" are if not ignored, easily forgiven. Those same "flaws" are frequently used to trash the prequels over and over.
Bandersnatch wrote:Please watch the entire 55 minute interview, not just the 2 snippets that were inexplicably selected after I posted the complete link.
kthxbye
doafhat wrote:...fans embraced Star Wars for reasons that Lucas doesn't really understand anymore.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest