The action was the first criminal enforcement against individuals who are using cutting-edge BitTorrent technology, Justice and Homeland Security Department officials said.
AdamKP wrote:So they don't go after the users that download the illegal material, only the people that are responsible for distributing it?That makes sense,better to kill it at the source, seems like going after everyone that uses that service would be a waste...But for some reason I thought they went after anyone, like, if you download it, you can very well get in trouble for doing so?Guess I misunderstood all that, lol.
http://p2p.weblogsinc.com wrote:....20th Century FOX takedown notices that are beginning to frequent, oh, hundreds of thousands of fans inboxes. The letters are being sent courtesy of BayTSP.
I’ve attached a copy of the infringement notice as it provides some clues as to what sort of information is being tracked and how FOX, in particular, intends to pursue copyright infringement by fans of the Star Wars series.
Please continue reading to see the full notice.....
DarExc wrote:Good thing I live in Canada, my government doesn't view file sharing as criminal.
that's probably what these guys thought too: Record industry scores Canadian legal victory over music filesharers
http://p2pnet.net wrote:p2pnet.net News:- The appearance online of Revenge of the Sith before its official release raises some interesting questions, particularly in light of yesterday’s take-down of the Elite Torrent BitTorrent indexing site.
Was the leak in fact a honey trap set up by the MPAA to give bounty hunters a clear shot at nailing torrent users?
Ayatollah Krispies wrote: It'd be a good way of tracking its P2P life, while at the same time ensuring that whoever d/l'ed it would be stuck with a less-than-perfect copy.
Swedish Chef wrote:The Feds, if they were smart, would urge Lucasfilm and whoever else is involved in the merchandising department to come up with a legit VCD release and keep everybody happy. Piracy might still be an issue, but at least ppl with few alternatives would finally be able to get their hands on a copy legally and Lucasfilm would be making plenty of $$$ in the meantime.
They are so worried about the internet, they are forgeting to get their product out their for people to choose.
They are so worried about the internet, they are forgeting to get their product out their for people to choose.
Dogg Thang wrote:Very true, Tern. Very true indeed. As someone who actually does go out and buy music, dvds etc it gets to me when measures are put in place to 'combat' piracy that affect my end use. The new Gorillaz album, for example, doesn't want to play on my PC. Now that's just a pain in the ass. What's funny is that I can just play a dled version - that's almost encouraging piracy.
For SW, I think this is all a storm in a teacup. I mean, has anyone here downloaded the workprint and not gone to see it in the cinema (possibly several times)? Could it really have affected revenue to any significant degree? I can't think so. For that matter, did anyone dl the dvd rips of the OT last year and not buy the sets?
On a side note - there are a massive number of albums I never would have bought had I not found mp3s floating around the net to listen to...
"Today's actions are bad news for Internet movie thieves and good news for preserving the magic of the movies," said MPAA president Dan Glickman.
SithBolts wrote:Anyone stupid enough to download the movie via a torrent should be made to watch the movie ten days in a row, but most of you wouldn't find that to be a bad thing.
Swedish Chef wrote:
Owning a copy of the goddamn movie on a hard drive isn't going to keep anyone from pruchasing legit copies of the movie later when it comes out.
t.
I have to say I was not in my underwear when I downloaded it.
Zéyann wrote:yep this definatly made Lucas loose a lot of money. He had to downgrade from a Boeing Businessjet 2 to a Boeing Businessjet 1. Pathetic stuff.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests