RedLetterMedia • Prequel Trilogy Reviews & Reactions

1999 • The Phantom Menace
2002 • Attack Of The Clones
2005 • Revenge Of The Sith

RedLetterMedia • Prequel Trilogy Reviews & Reactions

Postby BrotherTheFirst » December 22nd 2009 1:34 am

http://www.redlettermedia.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/RedLetterMedia

Hilarious and accurate.

[spoil]
[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/FxKtZmQgxrI&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/ZG1AWVLnl48&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/IdQwKPVGQsY&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/SOlG4T1S2lU&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/TBvp1r2UpiQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/ORWPCCzSgu0&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/fIWKMgJs_Gs&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]
[/spoil]

Star Wars: The Phantom Menace Review (Part 1 of 7)
User avatar
BrotherTheFirst
 
Posts: 278
Join: January 14th 2005 4:42 pm

Postby Emperor's Prize » December 22nd 2009 10:20 pm

I saw this a few days ago. Got through maybe the first three installments. The guy has some pretty undeniable points.

But honestly? The gag gets old real. quick. It's *not* an old guy. It's some schmo pretending to be an old guy. His voice is fucking annoying. And his non sequitur jokes are a bit like Chinese water torture.

So yeah, good points (some *real good points*), but not worth spending OVER AN ENTIRE HOUR (add it up, seven segments @ ten minutes per segment) of your life watching. :mad:
Emperor's Prize
 
Posts: 289
Join: August 24th 2004 8:30 pm
Location: The Empire State

Postby Verboten » December 23rd 2009 12:01 am

I enjoyed most of it. His Star Trek reviews are pretty good too.

I'd kind of like to see him do EII and EIII, but I guess it would be redundant.
User avatar
Verboten
 
Posts: 136
Join: September 15th 2006 11:25 pm

Postby Bandersnatch » December 23rd 2009 9:44 am

Emperor's Prize wrote: His voice is fucking annoying.


To say the least.

I'd rather have Jar Jar stick his tongue in my ear than to listen to another minute of this fucking dweeb's voice. :o
User avatar
Bandersnatch
OBGYN
 
Posts: 3644
Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm

Postby Joe1138 » January 8th 2010 2:27 am

Emperor's Prize wrote:The gag gets old real. quick. It's *not* an old guy. It's some schmo pretending to be an old guy. His voice is fucking annoying. And his non sequitur jokes are a bit like Chinese water torture.


Not for nothing but it's pretty obvious this character is a put on but that's part of the charm. That said, I don't agree with his views at all and something tells me he doesn't much either. After all, you've got to love something a whole hell of a lot to put this much effort into hating on it. Either way, funny is funny and this review is funny. "Cartoon rabbit that steps in the poopie" kills me every single time.

EDIT: Oh and Verboten, looks like you got (half of) your wish:

[flash width=425 height=344]http://www.youtube.com/v/mkxQ6HYDwIA&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]
User avatar
Joe1138
 
Posts: 523
Join: April 20th 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Southern California

Postby Maveritchell » January 8th 2010 12:41 pm

Joe1138 wrote:I don't agree with his views at all and something tells me he doesn't much either. After all, you've got to love something a whole hell of a lot to put this much effort into hating on it.

I don't know if that's necessarily true. Loving something doesn't mean overlooking its flaws, it means recognizing them and embracing them. There is some hyperbole there for obvious comic effect, but it's probably pretty likely that the author agrees with what he wrote - it's tough to riff on something for an hour if you don't think it should be made fun of - either that or he is a cognitive dissonance Zen master.

That said, I thought Episode 1 was the best of the prequels and Episode 2 the worst, so it will be fun (and mildly cathartic) to hear a comedic eviscerating of "Clones."
User avatar
Maveritchell
 
Posts: 216
Join: March 24th 2005 12:17 am

Postby Joe1138 » January 8th 2010 3:38 pm

Maveritchell wrote:I don't know if that's necessarily true. Loving something doesn't mean overlooking its flaws, it means recognizing them and embracing them.


I agree with that sentiment wholeheartedly. My observation was more pointed at the effort spent on his part to a) write the review b) recite the review in an actorly fashion (it's basically a performance, complete with some pretty well timed comic beats and interludes) and c) cut a very effective montage of clips to accompany said review.
User avatar
Joe1138
 
Posts: 523
Join: April 20th 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Southern California

Postby foxbatkllr » January 22nd 2010 3:18 pm

Anyone who dedicates that much time to something they hate is POS. If he doesn't hate the prequels he better tackle the OT as well, cuz there's a hell of a lot wrong with the OT.
foxbatkllr
 
Posts: 531
Join: April 24th 1981 6:59 pm
Location: San Diego

Postby ETandElliott » January 22nd 2010 4:13 pm

I loove StarWars, this video is stupid. Buying advance tix for Red Tales who's with me?
User avatar
ETandElliott
 
Posts: 1493
Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Deep Space Nine

Postby Emperor's Prize » January 22nd 2010 7:24 pm

I'm already standing in line to be first for tix.

For real.
Emperor's Prize
 
Posts: 289
Join: August 24th 2004 8:30 pm
Location: The Empire State

Postby Ascovel » January 24th 2010 8:03 am

Clearly a lot of effort went into this and there are some excellent scenes (the basement!), but man is it slow and overdrawn. I was getting bored before it even started to get funny and definitely I don't have the patience to watch all 7 parts of it.

Also, let's face it it's just another sheep rant and not a proper review.
User avatar
Ascovel
 
Posts: 395
Join: March 19th 2005 12:39 pm

Postby Joe1138 » January 29th 2010 1:31 am

Ascovel wrote:Also, let's face it it's just another sheep rant and not a proper review.


It's basically a super rant. The problem I have with this review is the same problem I have with nearly every other negative review of the prequels and that is they spend far too much time analyzing what the movies aren't instead of what the movies are.
User avatar
Joe1138
 
Posts: 523
Join: April 20th 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Southern California

Postby Bandersnatch » January 29th 2010 8:07 am

Joe1138 wrote: ...they spend far too much time analyzing what the movies aren't instead of what the movies are.


Exactly.

10+ years after the movies release, I find that to be far more annoying and gay than Jar Jar.
User avatar
Bandersnatch
OBGYN
 
Posts: 3644
Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm

Postby ETandElliott » January 29th 2010 8:16 pm

But you can admit that Jar Jar is annoying, and gay.

I, on the other hand, can also find amusement in such a ridiculous cartoon character dicking around the Star Wars movies. It's a case of something being SO unfunny and so unbelievable that it's actually fuckin' hilarious. I even want to be deeply offended. What WAS he thinking??

Lately I can't get over Samuel L. Jackson being in the movies, doing nothing in particular most of the time. I think it was seeing his action figure at Wal-Mart with the purple lightsaber. "HE IS THE TRAITUHHHHARRRGGHH!!!!"
User avatar
ETandElliott
 
Posts: 1493
Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Deep Space Nine

Postby Bandersnatch » February 1st 2010 10:30 am

ETAndElliot4Ever wrote:But you can admit that Jar Jar is annoying, and gay.


Well yeah, of course. :)

But I have also always felt that way about the Ewoks and the Jabba the Hutt Muppet Show.
User avatar
Bandersnatch
OBGYN
 
Posts: 3644
Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm

RedLetterMedia • Attack Of The Clones Review

Postby Verboten » April 5th 2010 12:34 am

http://www.redlettermedia.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/RedLetterMedia

The Episode II review is up.

[spoil]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/CfBhi6qqFLA&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/Im7k4LUzA3Y&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/ux8pCqiiBLA&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/qGnorxUw4AA&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/Hz1L63TdhC8&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/o-isAmaVbsM&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/Blkx6axytKQ&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/9QThD0r3hZg&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/Iq0wv2ossJU&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]

[/spoil]

Star Wars: Attack Of The Clones Review (Part 1 of 9)
User avatar
Verboten
 
Posts: 136
Join: September 15th 2006 11:25 pm

Postby darthpsychotic » April 5th 2010 6:53 am

Image

Got this gif from the SA thread.
User avatar
darthpsychotic
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
 
Posts: 4265
Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm

Postby Mr. Pickles » April 6th 2010 12:44 am

This guy utterly nails it--again. He makes me wanna sell all my SW collectibles and punch myself in the face.
Mr. Pickles
 
Posts: 83
Join: June 7th 2005 9:48 pm

Postby Verboten » April 6th 2010 1:23 pm

He was spot on about Yoda. For instance, it really would have made more sense for the younglings to be meditating or even levitating stuff.
User avatar
Verboten
 
Posts: 136
Join: September 15th 2006 11:25 pm

Postby Jelperman » April 13th 2010 12:26 am

Mr. Pickles wrote:This guy utterly nails it--again. He makes me wanna sell all my SW collectibles and punch myself in the face.


Well, what are you waiting for?
Jelperman
 
Posts: 53
Join: April 12th 2005 9:54 pm

Postby Mr. Pickles » April 19th 2010 1:20 am

Your mom to call me back.
Mr. Pickles
 
Posts: 83
Join: June 7th 2005 9:48 pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack Of The Clones Review

Postby Joe1138 » April 19th 2010 3:38 pm

For much needed perspective, circa 1983...

[flash width=480 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/rB3V3qyZiFM&hl=en_US&fs=1&[/flash]
User avatar
Joe1138
 
Posts: 523
Join: April 20th 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Southern California

RedLetterMedia • Revenge Of The Sith Review

Postby bearvomit » December 31st 2010 1:28 pm

Mr. Plinkett's Star Wars is Shit and pizza rolls rule Episode 3 review

[align=center]PART 1[/align]
[spoil]
[flash width=640 height=385]http://blip.tv/play/AYKYsh8C[/flash][/spoil]

[align=center]PART 2[/align]
[spoil]
[flash width=640 height=385]http://blip.tv/play/AYKYvXYC[/flash][/spoil]

[align=center]PART 3[/align]
[spoil]
[flash width=640 height=385]http://blip.tv/play/AYKYuUQC[/flash][/spoil]
User avatar
bearvomit
 
Posts: 1703
Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm

Postby darthpsychotic » January 2nd 2011 10:13 pm

Eventually this and the previous RedLetterMedia threads are going to be merged into one. Links to full length video rips of each review will also be provided.


:runintoground: is the initial obvious reaction.

Bonus points are awarded for the introductory comedy dialog synced to relevant scenes.

Points are taken away for being as long as the actual movie.
User avatar
darthpsychotic
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
 
Posts: 4265
Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm

Postby ETandElliott » January 3rd 2011 10:26 pm

I thought it was good.
User avatar
ETandElliott
 
Posts: 1493
Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Deep Space Nine

Postby Arkamazza » January 4th 2011 11:33 am

It had some great moments. The GG/Palpatine holo-exchange was particularly hilarious. I would just hate to be the one to tell Harry that The Falcon did in fact make its way into the PT.

Image
User avatar
Arkamazza
 
Posts: 51
Join: October 28th 2010 8:30 pm

Postby Emperor's Prize » January 4th 2011 2:15 pm

As usual, he had a lot of interesting, mostly accurate critiques (the analysis of characters sitting/walking was particularly astute). But not his best effort, methinks. He spent a lot of time prequel-bashing and not focused on ROTS specifically, which made the overly long review feel redundant. His voice is still as annoying as hell. And it wasn't as funny as prior efforts.
Emperor's Prize
 
Posts: 289
Join: August 24th 2004 8:30 pm
Location: The Empire State

Postby Joe1138 » January 4th 2011 10:21 pm

darthpsychotic wrote:Points are taken away for being as long as the actual movie.


*shrugs shoulders* I think Goddard once said, "The best way to critique a film is to make a film," and that's precisely what he's done here. He takes the wind out of his own sails several times throughout the review(s) so the fact that his reviews are so long winded clearly isn't lost on him.

I actually agree with most of the points he makes in regard to Anakin's character and that's one of the reasons I LOVE the prequels. Again, the saving grace of the entire endeavor is that Lucas didn't simply remake the earlier films but rather mined the universe he created for deeper meaning, meaning that some may not see but so be it. Lucas has said he's satisfied with his creation and at the end of the day he got his uncompromised vision up on the screen. Everything that we see has a logic, a purpose that we can either interpret on ignore based on our personal reaction to the film itself. If Lucas struggled with the Machiavellian plot and behind the scenes motivations of some of the characters then perhaps that's to be expected-hey, there was only one Niccolo Machiavelli after all.

The entire saga is rife with astonishing ideas about heroism, culture, religion, philosophy, cinema, good, evil and even human nature. It is also, at times, clumsy and lumbering. I acknowledge this and forgive the films their flaws not just for all that they get right but for all that they say and mean to me.

A lot of what Plinkett says in this and all of his reviews has to be taken with some grain of salt. Any film analyzed to the depths Plinkett has gone to here can be revealed to be full of holes. You can just as easily render "Citizen Kane" (the other film he cites in his review) as wholly manipulative and completely implausible from the first scene; after all who is the room with Kane to hear him when utters his last word, "Rosebud?"
User avatar
Joe1138
 
Posts: 523
Join: April 20th 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Southern California

Postby Ascovel » January 5th 2011 10:04 pm

Do you have some secret entry into the Star Wars part of my brain Joe1138? It's at least the second time I read my thoughts copied inside your post to the point of it starting to feel creepy.

Even this:

Any film analyzed to the depths Plinkett has gone to here can be revealed to be full of holes. You can just as easily render "Citizen Kane" (the other film he cites in his review) as wholly manipulative and completely implausible from the first scene; after all who is the room with Kane to hear him when utters his last word, "Rosebud?"


Although no wait, I've seen the review one day after you wrote this post...
User avatar
Ascovel
 
Posts: 395
Join: March 19th 2005 12:39 pm

Postby Joe1138 » January 5th 2011 11:26 pm

Ascovel wrote:Do you have some secret entry into the Star Wars part of my brain Joe1138? It's at least the second time I read my thoughts copied inside your post to the point of it starting to feel creepy.


Chalk it up to great minds thinking alike.


...By the way, you left your bathroom light on. *DUN DUNN DUNNNNN*
User avatar
Joe1138
 
Posts: 523
Join: April 20th 2004 11:57 pm
Location: Southern California

Rebuttal to RLM's Episode I Review - A Study in sheep Stupidity

Postby Alexrd » January 16th 2011 3:10 pm

A message board user named Jim Raynor has written an incendiary 108-page tome as a rebuttal to the Red Letter Media review of The Phantom Menace called Red Letter Media’s Episode I Review: A Study in sheep Stupidity.


Download

It has been interesting to read it so far. I advise you all to read it too.
User avatar
Alexrd
 
Posts: 632
Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am

Re: Rebuttal to RLM's Episode I Review - A Study in sheep Stupidity

Postby Jelperman » January 30th 2011 11:16 am

Alexrd wrote:
A message board user named Jim Raynor has written an incendiary 108-page tome as a rebuttal to the Red Letter Media review of The Phantom Menace called Red Letter Media’s Episode I Review: A Study in sheep Stupidity.


Download

It has been interesting to read it so far. I advise you all to read it too.


I read it yesterday and it confirms what I've thought ever since Red Letter Moron and his little cockgoblins began polluting the Internet:

They have all gone Full Retard.



Image
Jelperman
 
Posts: 53
Join: April 12th 2005 9:54 pm

Re: Rebuttal to RLM's Episode I Review - A Study in sheep Stupidity

Postby Bandersnatch » January 30th 2011 6:04 pm

Alexrd wrote:
A message board user named Jim Raynor has written an incendiary 108-page tome as a rebuttal to the Red Letter Media review of The Phantom Menace called Red Letter Media’s Episode I Review: A Study in sheep Stupidity.


Download

It has been interesting to read it so far. I advise you all to read it too.


I just read it. It's very well thought out, and although there are a few misused or misplaced words, I have to agree with pretty much all of his rebuttal. Especially "I don't understand how anyone can bash Jar Jar Binks on one hand but like Mr. Plinkett on the other." That's what I've been saying. The whole thing is just an overdone and unfunny schtick, with little bearing on what a normal human person would think about a fucking movie.

The whole thing is basically one geek calling out another, but at least Jim Raynor actually watched and understood TPM, and Star Wars in general, before writing this. And the Red Letter dude was obviously just being a loser fan boy dork bag.
User avatar
Bandersnatch
OBGYN
 
Posts: 3644
Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm

Re: Rebuttal to RLM's Episode I Review - A Study in sheep Stupidity

Postby Jelperman » January 30th 2011 9:42 pm

Bandersnatch wrote:I just read it. It's very well thought out, and although there are a few misused or misplaced words, I have to agree with pretty much all of his rebuttal. Especially "I don't understand how anyone can bash Jar Jar Binks on one hand but like Mr. Plinkett on the other." That's what I've been saying. The whole thing is just an overdone and unfunny schtick, with little bearing on what a normal human person would think about a fucking movie.

The whole thing is basically one geek calling out another, but at least Jim Raynor actually watched and understood TPM, and Star Wars in general, before writing this. And the Red Letter dude was obviously just being a loser fan boy dork bag.


Given that TPM, like the rest of Star Wars, was made so that grade schoolers could understand it...

Advantage: Jim Raynor
Jelperman
 
Posts: 53
Join: April 12th 2005 9:54 pm


Re: RedLetterMedia • Prequel Trilogy Reviews & Reactions

Postby yarq » July 1st 2025 4:34 am

сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайт
сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайт
сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайт
сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайт
сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайт
сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайт
сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайт
сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайт
сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайт
сайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтсайтtuchkasсайтсайт
yarq
 
Posts: 5470
Join: June 5th 2025 2:49 am


Return to Prequel Trilogy

Statistics

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron