cantina_patron wrote:I hope it's not Lucas who comes up with the titles. The PT titles weren't exactly inspiring (except ROTS, which is a reversal of the Revenge of the Jedi anyway).
"If Disney wants to make another cool billion dollars like it did with The Avengers last summer, all it needs to do is make a Boba Fett time-travel flick. It would center on a character everyone digs and allow for a greatest hits of Star Wars while playing with an already-established timeline, a la Back to the Future. You could use every living (and dead) actor from the previous Star Wars films, no matter what their age -- which means Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher and Harrison Ford can come and play as well. It'd be a dream come true for any Star Wars fan -- particularly those of us who opted out of the boring-ass real world every summer for galaxies far, far away."
"So in a world where Disney needs to make back its investment, we may indeed see an all-Boba Fett film. And if the Force wills it, maybe it'll even be about Boba Fett lost in the Star Wars universe time stream. But even if it became the highest-grossing film of all time, it'd still never be as good as Pete King's version."
TroyObliX wrote:I was thinking Washington, actually. We'll see, I'd like to know more about how/if the FED's are going to respond to these measures by the States before relocating. Although I think they are too busy playing "Post-Election Porno Email Show & Tell" these days. FBI scores headshot on CIA, CIA nails FBI agent in-charge of investigation in return, and the whole mess is currently taking down the US General and (once) future commander of NATO.
stan Marsh wrote:A part of me wishes they would abandon this timeline altogether and go to the old republic. Revan is too obscure for mainstream but would make the sheep in me delighted.
stan Marsh wrote:Revan is too obscure for mainstream but would make the sheep in me delighted.
The_Somnambulist wrote:Ain't It Cool News just posted an article about rumored titles.
The two that are talked about, reportedly used by George Lucas in coming up with the stories, are Rise of the Jedi and Return of the Sith.
If they're real, they're both terrible but I like the latter one more. It's kinda like a perverse joke. Warping the sense of optimism and finality in ROTJ by aping its title.
TroyObliX wrote:The Ancient Fear is a horrendously bad title. For starters, the entire SW Sage takes place "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away" thereby making the ancient-ness kind of redundant. Plus, it sounds like a lame metal band's first album title. I think it sucks, as far as 'words strung together' goes.
I'm not too confident in the reliability of this info anyways, so I kid. If this ends up being the actual title, it wont dissuade me from seeing the movie, but I will be preoccupied trying to figure out why they chose it.
TroyObliX wrote:Oh, I'm sure. You're right of course.
Makes me wonder if 'Star Wars' (as known upon release) benefitted from it's retroactive subtitling, as opposed to being called by it's lengthier, current nombre'. Would the people of the late 70's have seen this mouthful of jargon, and "need for insider-knowledge to decipher the meaning put forth by the title" as distracting? I mean, Jaws was about a big, God damned shark, people knew that going in. Does a distracting title have any impact on a film, Star Wars or otherwise? I wonder. Some marketing student probably did a bad paper on it, I should google that shit.
Not that that matters at all in the least, I'm just thinking out loud, through my fingertips.
Originally, Star Wars was given the subtitle Episode IV: A New Hope during the re-release of '79.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests