[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 555: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 440: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 440: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions_content.php on line 678: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions_content.php on line 678: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions_content.php on line 678: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions_content.php on line 678: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions_content.php on line 678: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions_content.php on line 678: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 132: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4764: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4766: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4767: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4768: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
millenniumfalcon.com • View topic - Enter JJ Abrams
It is currently February 17th 2020 2:12 pm




 
Post Posted: September 12th 2017 10:03 am
 
User avatar

Join: June 8th 2005 1:00 pm
Posts: 5
http://variety.com/2017/film/news/j-j-a ... 202548094/


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 10:05 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
Awesome.

http://www.starwars.com/news/j-j-abrams ... 1069686789

So Jack Thorne is out?


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 10:54 am
 
User avatar

Join: June 8th 2005 1:00 pm
Posts: 5
Yeah. I guess Chris Terrio will cowrite with JJ. Argo was pretty cool, but BVS....ugh.


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 1:34 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 24th 2015 5:26 am
Posts: 239
The worst news since it was announced Trevorrow was in...


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 2:42 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2005 11:20 am
Posts: 1224
Also, the release date has been pushed back to December of 2019.


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 3:55 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 24th 2004 6:14 pm
Posts: 152
.
I had a feeling that this was going to happen after Johnson softly back peddled out of being a contender.

I don't know what to make of this.

It took me years, but I went from loving Ep. 7 to loathing what a rehash it was. After this criticism was leveled his way, Abram's defense was that he was tasked with "reminding film goers" of the heart of the Star Wars universe, blah, blah, and blah. I can't find the quote now, but it sort of was inferring that the flag needed to be raised for the franchise after the Prequels. SOMETHING like that...

Well, if that WAS his Kennedy/Disney assigned task then...

Did Ep. 7 actually succeed at it?

I don't know.

I'm surprised at my lack of response to this news.

Abrams did some really brave and interesting stuff at the start of "Lost." But is he a strong finisher? "Lost" ended in an extremely cliched way, but there's no denying it, it was also handled extremely poetically.

I don't know.

My only Hope at this point is that in spite of the un-inspirational visual design choices made by Johnson, that Rian took a hammer to the universe plot-wise, and did something truly interesting with it. This would force Abram to respond to it, and perhaps raise his game.

Meh.


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 4:22 pm
 
User avatar

Title:
Join: October 10th 2014 11:38 pm
Posts: 375
I warned you all.. You all brought this on with TFA after bashing Lucas mercilessly over the Prequels. Now you all have to live with your shame. This is Lucas' middle finger to you all for ripping the Prequels despite how original they were compared to anything JJ Abrams shits out. Just watch, Episode IX is going to be a remake of ROTJ. Let's watch the Porgs take on the First Order with primitive technology! Hurrah, Finn escapes an exploding superweapon (Death Star IV maybe?) in a Falcon-like ship! Watch the duel between Evil Luke (After he turns to the Dark Side) and Rey! And we all get to sit through the Force Ghost ending all over again only with Luke added to it. And you know it's going to happen. Mark my words, when you see this unfold in 2019, Think back to 2015 and now September 12, 2017 that I warned you all, not once but twice of Abrams' hack directing.

Just remember, blood is on your hands because you spent the last decade prior to 2015 shaming Lucas over his "lack of directing and writing skillz" only to allow an even bigger hack to come in and fuck with the sequel trilogy. And the ST wasn't even needed in the first place. ROTS wrapped up the saga nicely.


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 5:17 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632


What they did with TFA already ruined the sequel trilogy for me, so I'm not even mad. I simply don't care anymore. As times passes, I'm more and more glad that Lucas managed to finish his saga. THE saga.


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 5:34 pm
 
User avatar

Title:
Join: October 10th 2014 11:38 pm
Posts: 375


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 5:52 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 24th 2004 6:14 pm
Posts: 152
.
I'd caution in attacking the Star Wars fans who aren't thrilled with the Prequels.

It doesn't matter how one looks at Lucas' writing, it's hard to come away from it with any other conclusion other than it's ham-fisted at times.

The best writing from him came from during his time that he was still married to his first wife, an Oscar-winning script writer. Quite the coincidence, I must say...

He has some brilliant ideas told over the long term, and he shared them with the public in some pretty subversive ways. So subversive, in fact, that most people totally miss The Point of the films. I admire him for this, and would condemn the public for their ignorance, but...that's the way the public usually is. Oblivious to the massive powers that shape virtually everything they perceive.

But he...struggles...with believable, non-clunky dialogue. Lucas is a fry cry from Shakespeare.

Some of cinema's most cringe worthy scenes came from his mind. Mainline battle droids who walk like ducks with a stick up their butts, and who sound like Daffy Duck. Chewbacca doing the Tarzan swing and yell. The entire courtship of Anakin and Padme. The lifeless scenes from the Senate (politics CAN be told in an interesting way!). Anakin's and Obi-Wan's Mario World final duel. Christensen's overacting (he is a VERY good actor, unless he's prompted for "MORE anguish"). Boba Fett's jetpack bump into the sarlacc pit, etc. And his mind unleashed cringe worthy creations: the Jedi Council (who could connect with them as characters?), Ewoks, Death Star II, virtually all of the new additions to the Special Editions, and more.

This doesn't take away the things that he did right. He is a trailblazer bar none. But that doesn't excuse some of his very, VERY bad calls. They are his alone to hold.

And the comment that Lucas' Star Wars story is entirely told via Ep. 1-6 is "sort of" right. EXCEPT that he DID generate substantial content for Ep. 7-9. What that is, we may never know, although I'd love to see it myself.

Lucas' approach to the Prequels made the story seemingly "entirely" told by the end of Ep. 6, and that makes any film made by anyone set after Ep. 6 a tricky beast to pull off. The Ultimate Force Prophecy has already been fulfilled - what other story of the same impact is left to be told? That's the problem: it can't. Lucas ensured that himself.

I don't want to put any time into listing Abrams' Star Wars sins - they're too many to list. I'll touch on just one can of worms that he opened... He overpowered Force Adepts in a major way. Kylo Ren is able to literally FREEZE blaster bolts in thin air, and to command them to proceed again. Ren isn't even fully trained yet, and look how over the top powerful that is. With that set as the Power Bar, I wouldn't be surprised if Johnson depicts Force Adepts stopping lightsaber/equivalent weapons with their bare hands.

For Abrams, there is very little that isn't Over The Top, and that can lead to huge problems.

Ah, whatever.

I've got to learn to let go of those things I have no control.


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 6:44 pm
 
User avatar

Title:
Join: October 10th 2014 11:38 pm
Posts: 375


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 6:46 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 6:54 pm
 
User avatar

Title:
Join: October 10th 2014 11:38 pm
Posts: 375


Post Posted: September 12th 2017 8:25 pm
 

Join: September 25th 2016 11:51 am
Posts: 163


Post Posted: September 13th 2017 12:14 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 24th 2015 5:26 am
Posts: 239


Post Posted: September 13th 2017 12:42 pm
 
User avatar

Join: June 8th 2005 1:00 pm
Posts: 5


Post Posted: September 13th 2017 5:01 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 631
Location: Michigan
As someone who thought TFA tried too hard to be ANH redux, I'm actually happy JJ is directing Ep. 9. We have someone very familiar with the current story being told, and someone who I'm sure has better knowledge on how to bring that story to its conclusion. A harder job for someone coming in from the outside to pull off.

To his credit, JJ was critical of himself for certain aspects of TFA, so I think the opportunity he has to revisit the same franchise offers him a chance to improve upon parts of TFA he felt fell short.

I still think a Spielberg-directed Star Wars film is the ultimate theater experience awaiting to be had. If LFL does a Yoda-centric film, there's no one better to tell that story than Spielberg.


Post Posted: September 13th 2017 6:18 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2005 11:20 am
Posts: 1224
Abrams directing is practically Spielberg directing. Their styles have a lot in common.


Post Posted: September 14th 2017 4:05 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 24th 2015 5:26 am
Posts: 239
It really isn't...


Post Posted: September 14th 2017 4:19 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2005 11:20 am
Posts: 1224
If you're talking 1997-and-on/Dreamworks-era Spielberg (minus Crystal Skull), there's a huge difference. But nix the Beard's collaboration with John Williams in his 70s and 80s output and you have something uncannily similar to what Abrams is about. But I'm speaking in strictly visually stylistic terms that can be appreciated without any behind-the-scenes insight (i.e. directorial style). That could, of course, suggest a more significant difference. In any case, Abrams' Super 8 and that somewhat obsequious 2007 TED talk showed his hand.


Post Posted: September 18th 2017 7:20 pm
 
User avatar

Title:
Join: October 10th 2014 11:38 pm
Posts: 375


Post Posted: September 18th 2017 7:57 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2005 11:20 am
Posts: 1224
Abrams lens flare hyperbole. :roll:

It's funny. My earliest recollection of lens flares in film was through Spielberg's films. CE3K certainly has 'em "up the wazoo." The UFOs in that film are practically unidentified flying lens flares. And Spielberg's second-closest collaborator, Janusz Kaminski, lives and breathes flared light. A trait found in pre-Kaminski Spielberg films, though seldom noted.

But maybe I wasn't specific enough. The shared characteristics I'm referring to involve, beyond lens flares (in a non-pejorative sense), a similar use of long takes, blocking, framing and anamorphic lenses. All coupled with a strong visual effects focus and attachment to celluloid film.


Post Posted: September 18th 2017 8:58 pm
 
User avatar

Title:
Join: October 10th 2014 11:38 pm
Posts: 375
No, I disagree. I've seen CE3K and there was never a big ass lens flare every second in that one the way Abrams does with his films. Kaminski was brought in only because Slocombe had come down with an illness that left him completely blind and forced him to retire from Indiana Jones. Funny, Kaminski claimed Crystal Skull looks exactly like Raiders when I don't remember Raiders that BRIGHT. I don't recall the other three Indiana Jones films using vibrant color tone on film. These films looked more natural in color tone compared to Crystal Skull. I mean even the use of light coming into the sets in that one looked horribly fake. But to Kaminiski's credit, his use of fllters/color tone improved post-Crystal Skull. I mean, Lincoln and Bridge of Spies looked way more natural more realistic like than Crystal Skull.

So try again, Abrams sheep.


Post Posted: September 21st 2017 1:16 am
 
User avatar

Join: December 24th 2015 5:26 am
Posts: 239


Post Posted: September 21st 2017 6:37 am
 

Join: January 12th 2016 6:34 am
Posts: 64
You forget this story? http://www.indiewire.com/2015/05/kathle ... rs-263529/


Post Posted: September 24th 2017 2:36 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2005 11:20 am
Posts: 1224
Artistic plagiarism and nothing more? Talk about cynical. :whateva:

I was foolish in thinking that there aren't impermeable auras surrounding certain cinematic luminaries which apparently exempt them from fair comparison and likening to others. My bad.


Post Posted: September 28th 2017 3:15 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 24th 2015 5:26 am
Posts: 239
The extent to which Abrams appallingly derivative work is lauded by Hollywood is hugely cynical. That there is no sense of irony in his movies only serves to underline his key objective... to wit; to stand on the shoulders of giants and pass it off as his own work. Star Trek: Into Darkness and The Force Awakens being the zenith of that cynical filmmaking. To compare Abrams to Spielberg, is (IMHO) reducing the language of cinema to its most base level.


Post Posted: September 28th 2017 3:51 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2005 11:20 am
Posts: 1224
Song as old as rhyme. Every artist stands on the shoulders of those before them and even contemporarily. Art is rarely, if ever, created and successful in a vacuum.

This familiar line of criticism could be applied to Spielberg and his very obvious and as-touted influences and inspirations in Lean, Ford, Capra, Hitchcock, Curtiz and Wyler. It's just hip to casually bash successful neophytes in this day, age and medium. Or in any time, really.

But maybe I'm over-extending myself. I originally meant that when you get a helping of Abrams, you're undoubtedly getting a helping of Spielberg, for better or worse. I'm not saying that they're on the same level at all (I also hold Spielberg in higher regard) but the former can suggest what the latter would likely do in the Star Wars sandbox. But it very obviously wouldn't be one-to-one/the genuine article.


Post Posted: October 1st 2017 1:35 am
 
User avatar

Join: December 24th 2015 5:26 am
Posts: 239
I'm not sure one can criticise Spielberg for being derivative and plageristic of other films and filmmakers. He isn't perfect, he's a bit over sentimental for me, and some of his shots (even in his more serious films) are sometimes too contrived that they undermine the verisimilitude of the scene... so my criticism of Abrams isn't borne from an unquestioning love of Spielberg. It may be 'hip' to criticise Abrams (I personally wasn't aware that this was the case), but it's also apparent that filmmakers/artists/musicians etc. increasingly get perceived without an understanding of the wider context.

I understand that you are not stating that Abrams is as good/better than Spielberg, and I don't have an issue with you liking Abrams style or his films; I just don't think it helps to compare them, unless one is compearing them specifically to contrast what can be achieved through 'popular' cinema that can, in some way, transcend the form e.g Jaws, Close Encounters, Raiders of the Lost Ark, ET... to 'popular' cinema that does not transcend or progress the form e.g. Super 8, Star Trek 09/Into Darkness and The Force Awakens. For me the comparison only serves to underline that Abrams is much more interested in style over substance... but that's just my view.


Post Posted: October 4th 2017 8:48 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2005 11:20 am
Posts: 1224
Let's just all rest our cases and gleefully tune into HBO on October 7th at 8pm.


Post Posted: February 23rd 2018 7:12 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644


Post Posted: October 15th 2018 9:21 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
https://www.cinemablend.com/news/245943 ... scar-isaac


Post Posted: January 19th 2019 9:34 am
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235


Post Posted: January 20th 2019 4:12 pm
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644


Post Posted: January 30th 2019 7:36 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 3rd 2011 5:29 am
Posts: 186
Location: Andorra
solo. kylo solo


Post Posted: January 30th 2019 12:54 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 631
Location: Michigan


Post Posted: February 4th 2019 2:00 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 3rd 2011 5:29 am
Posts: 186
Location: Andorra
So, I know this is the wrong thread, but what is the correct one? Mods ...?

LUCASFILM LOGO - This really bothers me and I have not seen anything about it anywhere. The Lucasfilm logo animation sparkles all green and then dark and then golden, but in the sequels it is all dark. No green or gold. WTF? Why?


Post Posted: February 5th 2019 3:57 am
 
User avatar

Join: January 22nd 2004 10:02 pm
Posts: 1073
Location: Hel
Disney wanting to differentiate the new films from the Lucas produced films or to represent a new era or something? Who knows. Why did Lucas update it back in 97, simply to make it more flashy and modern I guess.


Post Posted: April 12th 2019 6:34 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 3rd 2011 5:29 am
Posts: 186
Location: Andorra


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©