Doctor When wrote:C’mon guys... it can’t be as poor as TFA. I have hope in Rian. Sure, he has to work with the characters of the previous film, but surely it has to be better...
KyleKartanMG wrote:94 % on Rotten Tomatos out of 126 critics.
Doctor When wrote:C’mon guys... it can’t be as poor as TFA. I have hope in Rian. Sure, he has to work with the characters of the previous film, but surely it has to be better...
red5standingby wrote:I preferred it to TFA myself. But it feels like a very different film.
Duke wrote:What the fuck was that? A comedy? A parody?
Bullshit. It's on the elevator floor, as seen in the trailer. Try watching the fucking movie next time. Or once, even.No kylo helmet after he smashes it
It was split in half, and perhaps reparable. She does still have it at the end.Rey’s lightsaber was destroyed / Reys lightsaber is destroyed and does not have one at end.
No more than in any other Star Wars movie. I remember the first one was a hoot when seeing it in 1977.Lots of humor.
Rose talks about fighting for those we love, then kisses Finn.No romance at all.
She falls through a collapsing floor, not a cliff.Finn defeats Phasma but she falls of cliff.
Hell yes they do.Finn and Poe do not have real big story arc.
Yes, they do.The books do not play any major part.
When would she have had time to do that? Or maybe she did. Did you want this movie to be 12 hours long?Rey does not even read them.
We don't know if it was a puppet, CGI or both.Yoda appears and its definitely a puppet and not CGI.
lol wut?The blue ghost haze is not that great.
Because Luke wasn't in that fucking scene. Jesus.Instead of Luke force grabbing saber, It’s on stand next to Snoke.
They do what they need to do. 3PO was fine, and didn't need much more screen time.Maz does not have big role nor C-3PO, nothing stands out.
He doesn't look that different. Just the hair. And of course it's not really him, it's a Force-projection.Another thing is when Luke is projected and walks in, it looks like a younger version of himself.
Either they CGI’d him or cleaned up Mark for the scenes.
MannyOrtez wrote:CG Yoda was horrible. He looked worse than in the prequels. His demeanor, and ridiculous laugh, was really corny and out of place. The fact that he can interact with the physical world makes no sense and was a terrible mistake. If he can conjure up lightning still, why isn't he lending a hand in battles?
MannyOrtez wrote:CG Yoda was horrible. He looked worse than in the prequels. His demeanor, and ridiculous laugh, was really corny and out of place. The fact that he can interact with the physical world makes no sense and was a terrible mistake. If he can conjure up lightning still, why isn't he lending a hand in battles?
Bandersnatch wrote:Obi-Wan's ghost could interact in ROTJ. He sat on a log. Why does a ghost need to sit?
Yoda probably can't lend a hand in battles for the same reason Obi-Wan said in ESB - "You must do it alone. I cannot interfere."
Monari wrote:Ultimately, this movie will make a billion dollars, and the franchise will move forward, but I find that I have a general apathy now towards where it will go. I’m not going to make any dramatic pronouncements of how I’m never going to watch Star Wars again or that it’s been ruined for all time, but I will say that the movie’s main theme of “letting the past die” resonated with me in a way Disney likely did not expect, in that I realize that maybe it’s time to let go of the Star Wars that I remember and recognize that this series isn’t really for me anymore.
royalguard96 wrote:People who will bash on the film for its "politics" are looking for an axe to grind to compensate for their own misplaced anger. I pay these people no attention because they deserve none.
royalguard96 wrote: Her endgame of sacrificing herself and her ship could have been performed by anyone. There was nothing about her character that deemed it *had* to be her. Any random Resistance fighter could have done the same, and the act of heroism wouldn't have been diminished in any way.
royalguard96 wrote:Very few, if any references to the prequels. Not that here *had* to be but some links would have been nice. As many of you probably know, I'm a bigger prequel fan than most.
royalguard96 wrote:Very few, if any references to the prequels. Not that here *had* to be but some links would have been nice. As many of you probably know, I'm a bigger prequel fan than most.
Bandersnatch wrote:I thought Luke talking about Darth Sidious was good enough as a Prequel reference, and I'm also not a Prequel hater. Some haters even totally reject the entire Sidious / Palpatine / Clone Wars plot of the PT, so Luke talking about it in TLJ shows that they are not trying to ignore the PT, as some still insist.
Bandersnatch wrote:royalguard96 wrote:Very few, if any references to the prequels. Not that here *had* to be but some links would have been nice. As many of you probably know, I'm a bigger prequel fan than most.
I thought Luke talking about Darth Sidious was good enough as a Prequel reference, and I'm also not a Prequel hater. Some haters even totally reject the entire Sidious / Palpatine / Clone Wars plot of the PT, so Luke talking about it in TLJ shows that they are not trying to ignore the PT, as some still insist.
Hokusai wrote:What do we expect them to mention? They werent there... "the trade federation... blah, blah"
Monari wrote:Ultimately, this movie will make a billion dollars, and the franchise will move forward, but I find that I have a general apathy now towards where it will go. I’m not going to make any dramatic pronouncements of how I’m never going to watch Star Wars again or that it’s been ruined for all time, but I will say that the movie’s main theme of “letting the past die” resonated with me in a way Disney likely did not expect, in that I realize that maybe it’s time to let go of the Star Wars that I remember and recognize that this series isn’t really for me anymore.
MannyOrtez wrote:Extremely well said. Fair review.
Monari wrote:Ultimately, this movie will make a billion dollars, and the franchise will move forward, but I find that I have a general apathy now towards where it will go. I’m not going to make any dramatic pronouncements of how I’m never going to watch Star Wars again or that it’s been ruined for all time, but I will say that the movie’s main theme of “letting the past die” resonated with me in a way Disney likely did not expect, in that I realize that maybe it’s time to let go of the Star Wars that I remember and recognize that this series isn’t really for me anymore.
MannyOrtez wrote:Extremely well said. Fair review.
Doctor When wrote:
Agree with you both... I too came away with the feeling that perhaps I’ve finally outgrown Star Wars (or Star Wars has outgrown me), but on reflection I think that’s bollocks.
Bandersnatch wrote:These new films aren't really being cranked out any more quickly than the Lucas era films. It's just that they now have multiple productions in cooking in the oven all at once.
If you look at the pre-production, main shooting and post-production on TFA and TLJ, it's a good 3 years for each film.
MannyOrtez wrote:
It makes me take a good long look at the saga in general. The first two films made are still - by far - the best two films. Force Awakens appeared to return SW to its glory but it hasn't aged well for me. With the prequels - I was pretty good at convincing myself at the time that they were good films. As I watch them now, their flaws are obvious. Heck they are even flawed in technical ways, some of the CG is bad, some of the sound is bad, some of the editing is bad. I never even realized that when I was younger. But the fact that Lucas made them gives them some gravitas. And I still feel that they are additive to the saga as a whole. TFA & TLJ feel like bad fan fiction when they misstep and do detract from the overall story.
With the prequels - the story ideas were fine, Lucas didn't execute them because he can't write dialogue or direct anymore. The flaws in the ST took root earlier in the writing process. With both Force Awakens & Last Jedi, it seems clear to me that the problem was that the creative forces couldn't let go of certain ideas that were obviously flawed, and bogged the movie down big time for it. The Rose/Finn plot was one of Johnson's babies - and you know what they say about screenwriting, you gotta kill the babies. It really had a huge ripple effect on the film, because it forced Johnson to contrive another plot to take place while Rose & Finn go off on this mission, which led to the absurd and whacky mutiny plot. For Force Awakens, the baby that needed killing was Star Killer base.
That said - I still liked lots of the Last Jedi, will probably see it another three times in the theater, buy myself the BluRay, etc. So, as a SW fan, I'm not going anywhere.
Bandersnatch wrote:These new films aren't really being cranked out any more quickly than the Lucas era films. It's just that they now have multiple productions in cooking in the oven all at once.
If you look at the pre-production, main shooting and post-production on TFA and TLJ, it's a good 3 years for each film.
Doctor When wrote:TFA came out in 2015 and by 2018 we’ll have had 4 Star Wars films in 3 years. That’s substantualy higher than the Lucas era. It’s a new film every year for the foreseeable future... and even just counting the new saga films, and not ‘anthology’, they are producing them every two year where Lucas was every 3. And in my opinion it shows. I get that production on the films overlaps, but that in itself onlsy serves to constrain development.
Zaius wrote:I had the pleasure of watching a double bill of The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi last night.
I personally, think The Last Jedi to be one of the best Saga films.
The depth and the verve and the detail are astonishing. This film is exceptional particularly for
attention to character motivation.
There's a dexterity to this film that works in tandem with the storytelling to produce a
new energy for this serial.
Bandersnatch wrote:These new films aren't really being cranked out any more quickly than the Lucas era films. It's just that they now have multiple productions in cooking in the oven all at once.
If you look at the pre-production, main shooting and post-production on TFA and TLJ, it's a good 3 years for each film.
Doctor When wrote:TFA came out in 2015 and by 2018 we’ll have had 4 Star Wars films in 3 years. That’s substantualy higher than the Lucas era. It’s a new film every year for the foreseeable future... and even just counting the new saga films, and not ‘anthology’, they are producing them every two year where Lucas was every 3. And in my opinion it shows. I get that production on the films overlaps, but that in itself onlsy serves to constrain development.
Bandersnatch wrote:Concerning release dates, you are correct. But there was a ton of work already done on TLJ by the time TFA came out. It's not like they started working on TLJ in January 2016. They already had been working on it for a year while TFA was in post. I get what you mean about the overlap in production time potentially causing some constraint, though. However, Disney/Lucasfilm has thousands of employees, whereas Lucas's Lucasfilm had a couple of thousand. There's stuff being worked on all the time there now, not just one film at a time. Lucas would spend 3 years on each film, but take about 6 months off after shooting and before going into post, because he could. He illustrates that on one of the Blu Ray commentaries.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests