Hmmm - what's in a name? I think it's probably a better title than The Force Awakens, but it's also a bit repetitive as we've already done this bit of narrative with Return of the Jedi...

Could "The Last Jedi" refer to Luke, or Rey?

Or could it refer to both of them, since Jedi is both singular and plural?

Also, red font for a movie title...

Awesome title! Has a sort of Samurai / Spaghetti Western ring to it.

I'm sure it refers to Luke, but then leads into Rey becoming the next Jedi.
Also, Luke is referred to as "the last Jedi" in TFA.

Luke was the last Jedi 2 films ago. I hope there's more going on in the narrative than this...

I like it. It's a line that Snoke says in TFA.

Snoke: The droid will soon be delivered to the Resistance, leading them to the last Jedi. If Skywalker returns, the new Jedi will rise.

What would be interesting (for me anyway) is if Luke trains Rey in the force, but not to be a Jedi... He knows that the way forward is to reject both Jedi and Sith doctrines. Him being the last Jedi would then have some narrative substance that differentiates it from the OT. I doubt it will even pan out like that, but interesting to speculate on the possibilities.

It's also in the opening crawl for TFA.

...will not rest until Skywalker, the last jedi, has been destroyed.

It's a good title. I was thinking it might be a bit cooler if it was "The Last of the JedI" to reference Yoda's line from ROTJ: "When gone am I, the last of the Jedi will you be," but The Last Jedi is cleaner.

Star Wars - The Last Jedi? I think I already read this book back in the 2013.

An uninspired title. It sounds like there could already have been five fanfilms with the same name.

It should have been 'The Last Jedi, Again'...

I think it's Rian's intention that the title be singular.

I'd be surprised if it didn't refer to Luke.

At this point, it's impossible to tell if it's singular or plural. I hope that the movie gives a better indication of the meaning behind the title than The Force Awakens. (It's Rey's "Force" that awakens, right?)

Per multiple translations from other countries, it's singular.

In Star Wars, light side masters often defer to their apprentices. It makes perfect sense for Luke to pass on his lightsaber. He's not even happy to see it at the end of TFA.

Awesome and cohesive symbolism already.

Should we assume that Luke has another lighsabre or that he doesn't use one?

At the end of ROTJ, Luke's (at the time) new, green lightsaber is dangling from his belt. Perhaps he's held onto that one.

Twitter descriptions of new footage, in this report ...

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-c ... story.html

Does Luke not recognize Rey? Or, is he faking like Yoda with Luke and Obi-wan with Maul?

It depends on what the context is... It could be a more philosophical question rather than it being literal...

More about the Disney shareholders preview:
http://www.avclub.com/article/luke-skyw ... lMarketing

He's one of Luke's Force posse. No doubt we'll be seeing more of him (and them). Makes perfect sense.

I think it's just as the official site says - He'll be there as part of the 40th anniversary panel.

The official site just now finally created an Episode 8 page. Nothing there yet:
http://www.starwars.com/films/star-wars ... -last-jedi

Maybe the trailer for The Last Jedi?

Didn't bother me that it didn't, but would have the potential to have been great.

I’m not sure why the writers thought that Yoda was the natural choice for the Force ghost. Either they didn’t understand the narrative trajectory of the original 6 films, or they simply believed Yoda was the more popular character for the target audience.

Was Yoda CG or a puppet? I clearly saw a puppet but some have claimed CG.

It's a puppet made from the ESB mold.