E_CHU_TA! wrote:Some of this is a bit too vague for me to comprehend. It sounds like retcon even though the post explicitly says "no retcon."
BTW: The site below picked-up ki adi's post as an "exclusive," which is a charming move. Is mf.com really "infamous" like the article's author states?
Exclusive: The Rise of Skywalker Massive Spoilers
Bandersnatch wrote:
Cool. Nothing really spoilery about those images though, just the usual and beautiful Star Wars visual poetry we've come to expect.
E_CHU_TA! wrote:Yeterday, Filoni refused to definitively answer whether Clone Wars characters will appear as live-action characters in the future.
https://youtu.be/3O51BVxxhHI
Does Palpatine redeem himself in the TROS (see 30 second mark)?
https://youtu.be/lyUSyTflBMo
ki adi moonshine wrote:
am I the only one who feels Daisy was throwing major shade at TLJ?
Freezus wrote:Told you all that Rey is a Skywalker. Lmao. I’ve been saying this since 2015. You guys were like noo but it’s here now. Accept the truth.
bearvomit wrote:POOR writing if Matt Smith is "the Son" or whoeverdafuck that is...
you don't just introduce a brand new character that no one in the movies has ever mentioned, in the FINAL FREAKIN FILM and say, "yeah, he was the one behind it ALLLLLLL"
which is why this shit is probably true.
Bandersnatch wrote:I never suggested she wasn't a Skywalker. But I love that you continue to be a cunt about it.
bearvomit wrote:POOR writing if Matt Smith is "the Son" or whoeverdafuck that is...
you don't just introduce a brand new character that no one in the movies has ever mentioned, in the FINAL FREAKIN FILM and say, "yeah, he was the one behind it ALLLLLLL"
which is why this shit is probably true.
bearvomit wrote:POOR writing if Matt Smith is "the Son" or whoeverdafuck that is...
you don't just introduce a brand new character that no one in the movies has ever mentioned, in the FINAL FREAKIN FILM and say, "yeah, he was the one behind it ALLLLLLL"
which is why this shit is probably true.
PointOfView wrote:He's not brand new. He's been around since the Clone Wars cartoon.
SithWitch wrote:OMG. I am so excited about this. I would be so happy if we got to see a Mortis connection. It looks like Dark Rey is on Mortis IMHO.
cantina_patron wrote:Lucas has helped? Whatever happened to their "divorce"? JJ No Original Thought in His Head Abrams ran out of the OT movies to copy and had to run back to Papa George for help. They must have made a big donation to his museum. Maybe they should have listened to him more in the first place.
Kyle wrote:Freezus, I wish that I could forget Solo, BUT it was written by Kasdan. Besides, it is OFFICIAL canon. That means that film is what was wanted by Disney.
And Mark Hamill is at it AGAIN. Prior to The Last Jedi, he gave so many "in your face" warnings to the public. Warnings that were SPOT ON. Recently, he stated that he HOPES not to have to do Luke again. Would the Mark Hamill of ten years ago ever believe that he'd find himself in such a position? That man CHAMPIONED Luke Skywalker for most of his life. For him to feel the way he does now, it's unthinkable. He's DONE.
If Hamill can't muster genuine enthusiasm for Ep. IX, why should we? He criticisms were all On Target for Ep. VIII, and I have no reason not to trust his judgement now.
Hokusai wrote:TLJ- running out of fuel
TRoS- mortis
Thats a huge jump for the average movie goer... I dont see it.
Topeka wrote:Great stuff. While I would initially agree the "Mortis" concept is too heady for a general audience to appreciate, just including Bad Guy with backstory that can be explored later seems appropriate. The Force Awakens does establish Kylo as an artifact hunter. The Last Jedi is just a colossal mess that did not propel the characters toward any meaningful direction. Circling back around to the original idea seems appropriate, especially given that JJ is concluding "his" story.
SI wrote:Looks possible Rey and the squad are on Yavin IV to stop Kylo Ren from "awakening" or contacting some evil via the Death Star
Shatterhand2049 wrote:Nope. You had me at least open-minded until that second set of "spoilers". When I read that, I knew we were being had.
Kyle wrote:.
PointOfView wrote:
Oh god, please shut up. The vision thing was only changed because they knew people would go bonkers over it. You really think their webpage knows exactly what is going on with the movie? Give me a break with your trolling.
Hokusai wrote:Read another big leak today totally different than this... we shall see.
Hokusai wrote:That’s a quarter of what I read. You think this matches up?
Hokusai wrote:Read another big leak today totally different than this... we shall see.
E_CHU_TA! wrote:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest