RogueOne1216 wrote:The best episode yet with a sad death, a cliffhanger of uncertainty, more development for Baby Yoda and stakes raised to the point where we don’t know how Season 1 will end.
Final score: 10/10.
Deborah Chow’s gonna nail the Obi-Wan Kenobi series
SI wrote:that ending has me
Kyle wrote:I still wish that the Deadpool wannabe actress had never been hired, as even Jake Lloyd can outperform her. Hopefully with their next series, a little more money will be tossed into the budget, and they can avoid such C-Grade performers altogether.
Doctor When wrote:...but I think it’s very middle of the road and so pedestrian in terms of scope, narrative and production values.
Doctor When wrote:I fear for the Obi-Wan show.
Doctor When wrote:...but I think it’s very middle of the road and so pedestrian in terms of scope, narrative and production values.
The_Somnambulist wrote:The other day, my friend curiously remarked that he didn't see anything "profound" in the latest TROS trailer and thus felt letdown.
Guys... let's not blow Star Wars out of proportion. Your words, Doctor When, remind me of certain critical reviews from 1977, 1980 and 1983.
You can't expect Star Wars to titillate as Shakespearean macabre does or be as devious as satirical deconstruction is. Apples and oranges.
Doctor When wrote:I fear for the Obi-Wan show.
Kyle wrote:Why is that?
Doctor When wrote:Primarily because they’ve taken, what was a concept with huge potential (i.e. a Mandolrian bounty hunter story set post ROTJ), and made something that mostly just limps from episode to episode. As already mentioned, the show isn’t bad... the direction isn’t bad... the acting isn’t bad... Indeed, if they’d given this a movie budget, and scaled it up, it could have been really good. But as it is, the budget looks limited, it’s similar sets/locations week to week, and it doesn’t particularly offer much (IMO).
A Kenobi film was probably the single most ‘ready to go’ concept that could have made for a big and popular movie. A relatively popular star (Ewan) reprising his role, the opportunity to bring Vader, the Emperor, Yoda, Maul, Boba Fett et al into the story, with a built in scale that would have matched Rogue One at least.
I very much anticipate a ‘Kenobi’ TV series will have the same production values (or similar ball park) to The Mandalorian... and given some of the negative critical response to TLJ, they ain’t gonna throw tons of money at a Kenobi project. Indeed, they may pull back. If I had to choose between Rogue One/Solo and The Mando, it would be the former every time. Not because they are better concepts per se, but they offer more visually, cinematically etc. The Mando looks like an episode of the 80’s A-Team in comparison.
Doctor When wrote:Star Wars, prior to Disney, was never this vanilla.
Doctor When wrote:Star Wars, prior to Disney, was never this vanilla.
The_Somnambulist wrote:You do realize there's never been any sex in Star Wars, right? And most of the darkest aspects are merely implied, no? Star Wars has always been Puritan (read vanilla) country. Look at the fan base.
The Mandalorian is very true to what Star Wars has always been. Don't let the size of the phenomenon blind ya. That happens.
RogueOne1216 wrote:I am sorry, but, I don’t agree with everything you just said. The first season of The Mandalorian cost $120M to make, $15M per 8 episodes.
I would like to think Kenobi will be allowed to cost 67% higher, because, it’s only one season (at least for now), and it’ll only be 6 episodes, thus making it a $150M show, which is good enough for it’s budget as it will be in line with the budgets of the Marvel Studios Disney+ shows (WandaVision, Loki, Ms. Marvel, Moon Knight, Hawkeye, etc.).
Also, I feel Kenobi at the very least, even if it’s a movie split into 6 1-hour episodes, will still be like how it was initially planned.
Doctor When wrote:Star Wars, up until Disney, has never been conceptually and visually bland. It’s always been focused on pushing the concepts and filmmaking processes. I’m not sure I’d think differently if The Mandalorian had sex in it? That seems to be a very strange criteria for assessing relative blandness??? My perception of Star Wars isn’t based on the liberal mindness of the filmmaker, but what’s portrayed on screen in real time.
SI wrote:that ending has me
Kyle wrote:Indeed.
Me too.
BRILLIANT writing.
Poetic.
The end is declared from the beginning, and the journey goes full circle.
The hero's journey.
Quite the cliffhanger.
Unexpected.
Best episode yet.
I still wish that the Deadpool wannabe actress had never been hired, as even Jake Lloyd can outperform her. Hopefully with their next series, a little more money will be tossed into the budget, and they can avoid such C-Grade performers altogether.
Doctor When wrote:As I said, it’s all based on preference. I’d take the Star Wars films any day over The Mandalorian. For example, in terms of Disney material, Rogue One would be (IMO) infinitely inferior if treated in the same way as The Mandalorian. Which isn’t to say a TV series couldn’t be great, and a TV series could complement the big cinema releases... but Disney are now going with a policy of ‘either or’ and not ‘both’.
That Disney would choose to take Ewan McGregor’s Obi-Wan and put him in a small scale TV series, rather than a big budget live action film is, in my opinion, a huge mistake on Disney’s part... and should start alarm bells ringing. I’d posit, it’s a decision based on reaction to TLJ/Solo rather than anything else (and the negative buzz around TROS won’t help). And that kind of strategy (reactive) rarely ends well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest