All tracks from The Last Jedi soundtrack now exist on Disney's YouTube page
CoGro wrote:I don't know where you're getting this "rushed production" narrative from. Not only is it untrue, it's a completely irrelevant factor as it relates to the final product. We aren't talking about a 9 month production here - we're talking 2.5-3 years. Ultimately, it doesn't matter - Crystal Skull was 19 years after Last Crusade, did that help Lucas crack a better story? Civil War was 2 years after Winter Soldier, and 1 year after Age of Ultron and is arguably Marvel's best film..
Second, Williams had just as much time to compose this score as he has for any previous Star Wars film. I believe he actually started scoring TLJ earlier than he did any of the other films, which means more time to smooth things over during the editing process. In the film, this score contained no noticeable "harsh" edits or borrowing from other films' tracks, which is something AOTC, ROTS and TFA all suffered from because the score hadn't been updated after the editing process.
As for TLJ's score, I actually felt better about it leaving the theatre than I did TFA's. I have grown to really appreciate TFA's score, but it'll take time before I soak in TLJ's. Give it a chance. It might be better than you originally thought.
Doctor When wrote:Please provide evidence that Williams started scoring TLJ earlier in production than any other Star Wars film.
Doctor When wrote:Please provide evidence that Williams started scoring TLJ earlier in production than any other Star Wars film. I’d be interested in seeing that. As for the rest, citing a couple of examples isn’t a very robust defence. Going by that logic, each and every incremental reduction in production would produce something better. That is typically not the case. And I certainly don’t think the new Star Wars films, or Marvels output, supports the notion that a constantly in motion production line equates to quality cinema. It certainly equates to more money though. Common sense should tell you that when development is based primarily on the fastest route to market, often the impact is to the development process itself. I also think Civil War is weak, and is not a great example of quality filmmaking (certainly not one I’d cite)... but that’s just my opinion.
Personally speaking, I’m sure the score won’t grow on me to the extent that I’d reverse my opinion, but it’s possible. I’ve listened to enough music, and enough new SW scores, to distinguish between the ones I believe have more value/merit. I’ve played the score for TLJ half a dozen times and I think it’s by far the weakest and most pedestrian SW OST. And I don’t believe this view is particular to me. As much as I love Williams, and as much as it pains me to say it, it really is one of his weakest.
Doctor When wrote:
https://www.flickeringmyth.com/2017/02/ ... s-roundup/
February 2017
http://comicbook.com/starwars/2017/05/2 ... ams-score/
May 2017
I think that's enough time to score a movie.
Irrespective of the top of my head big budget blockbuster examples I gave, I still believe your thesis that less time to produce a movie = lower quality of movie is baseless. Most movies that are released don't have the benefit of 1.5 years of production, let alone the extra year or so that big budget films are afforded. I think you're grasping for excuses as to why the film's quality didn't measure up to your expectation. Your opinion is your opinion though.
Back to the score, we'll agree to disagree. AOTC is Williams' SW low point for me, irrespective of "Across the Stars" being a solid theme. That's followed closely by ROTS, which is totally confused musically. Neither of those films know how to use new or existing Star Wars motifs and place them in the movie properly.
Anyway, at this point in his life I'm just happy John Williams is making new music.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest