millenniumfalcon.com

because she has breasts and a vagina and is better looking than King Arthur?

movie looks like shit. since when is the queen a skinny pagan with a bow and arrow?

Since when does Bruckheimer make quality films?

I dunno, the trailers look ok, and Clive Owen is a very good actor. (possible next James Bond).
They seem to be cashing in on Kiera's popularity, which is bullshit as she isn't the main character.

I'm sure everyone realises that the King Arthur "story" is nonsense, and only is part of "history" due to some of the characters have the same names as people do did actually exist.

The problem I have with the trailer/movie is that they are trying to make out that this movie is the true story, and previous movies were just glamourising King Arthur and his knights of the round table. This is gritty, this is realism, this is what actually happened.

I hope its ok, but something tells me its trying to cash in on the success of LotRs, Gladiator and Braveheart.

We'll have to wait and see.

And then there's the ficional Galahad who in this story is the same age as his dad Lancelot.

There actually might have been a real Arthur around 600AD who united a bunch of Celtic states together in England, but that's about as far as it goes. There's little evidence. Personally I would have loved to see a movie based on The Once and Future King or the writings of Malory made instead of this.